#Court

Roscoe B Davis🎖⭐️⭐️⭐️

RoscoeBDavis1

Well Judge Lamberth after reviewing the Bolton book went ahead and ruled in favor of releasing because there are so many copies already distributed amongst media outlets the DOJ injunction

Dani Welch

DanielleJWelch

Let's talk about burnout. I've taken exactly 3 days off since everything went virtual 6 months ago. I worked on every single one of those 3 days, because there is

Dr Patrick O'Brien

patrickcobrien

This is now a complete mess. No Irish judge has ever been impeached. The only time the process was attempted, the allegation related to criminal behaviour (possession of child pornography).

Matthew Desmond

just_shelter

I've been off Twitter for a while, but I wanted to share a quick stat that's important to the CDC eviction moratorium:In Milwaukee, 34% of cases in which a tenant

joy to the jump (inside)

JodiesJumpsuit

More food nostalgia: mid 2000’s Eaton’s Centre South Food Court had a Harvey’s, and the lunch shift manager helmed the cash register and took absolutely no shit from anyone, you

Regina Dulanjali

ReginaDulanjali

More points from govt notice sent to Twitter about unblocking content related to a hashtag about PM, farmers, and genocide:(Twitter says no comment at this time)Points from Govt notice to

Michael Barnes

MWBarnesEsq

1/Texas, now joined by a sizeable number of otherStates seeking to intervene, has brought this originalaction in this Court, seeking to reestablishconstitutional order in the selection of electors whowill select

Terra LeMay

rarelytame

Thinking a lot about the process of healing and reconciliation following violence, about what can happen when you move on without consequences. I may delete this thread later. For now,

#ReleaseTheKRAKEN BrunoBarking

Bruno062418

Q WATCH THE WATER...Federal court battle could change fluoridation of water for millions ht @kate_awakening https://www.oregonlive.com/health/2020/06/federal-court-battle-could-change-fluoridation-of-water-for-millions.html 2/ POTUS hinted

Robin Rudowitz

RRudowitz

With the SCOTUS set to hear the case to overturn the ACA tomorrow - here are a few things to keep in mind about implications for #Medicaid:https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/eliminating-the-aca-what-could-it-mean-for-medicaid-expansion/ A rev

Mike Dunford

questauthority

Election Litigation Update: Pennsylvania/SCOTUSPennsylvania has filed a response in Trump's attempt to have the Supreme Court consolidate a bunch of cases well after the last plausible minute.This is *NOT* an

Davy Carter

DavyCarter

This post is NOT debating, opposing, or supporting the mask mandate so please no @‘s in that regard. Rather, I’ve been trying get my head wrapped around the legal parameters

Liz Crash

AsFarce

William Ah Ket is well known as one of the very few early twentieth-century Chinese-Australian lawyers and a fierce opponent of racism. that's not what this thread is about. it's

New Left Eviews

LeusderListicle

It’s really astonishing how most of the British economy is just a real estate scam. And of course, being the UK, there’s a television series the charmingly exploits the brutality

Franny Rabkin

franstaar

A thread on cross examination, George Bizos and Geoff Budlender I don’t get to see much cross examination as I normally cover motion court proceedings. But cross examination is a

Louis Century

LouisCentury

The arc of Joe Arvay’s stare decisis argument is an incredible case study in strategic Charter litigation. 1/6https://twitter.com/emmajcunliffe/status/1336384216318304256 Arvay’s argument that the common law rule of stare decisis is sub

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.