Read on Twitter...but says “the IC does not know the accuracy of this allegation.”
Ratcliffe just declassified to Graham a claim that Russian intel alleged that Clinton “approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against [Trump] by tying him to Putin and the Russians& #39; hacking of the DNC.”...but says “the IC does not know the accuracy of this allegation.”" title="https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🤔" title="Denkendes Gesicht" aria-label="Emoji: Denkendes Gesicht">Ratcliffe just declassified to Graham a claim that Russian intel alleged that Clinton “approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against [Trump] by tying him to Putin and the Russians& #39; hacking of the DNC.”...but says “the IC does not know the accuracy of this allegation.”" class="img-responsive" style="max-width:100%;"/>
It’s reasonable to ask why Graham and Ratcliffe would even put this out there if, as Ratcliffe acknowledges, “the IC does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication.”
This >>> https://twitter.com/samstein/status/1311015118004785154">https://twitter.com/samstein/...
A few minutes later, Graham officially notices a hearing with Andrew McCabe for next Tuesday.
