In sociology of crime, & specifically violence, I am becoming concerned about data instruments that do not include & #39;sex& #39;.
Over time & across cultures, sex has been a powerful predictor of crime & violence.
Decades of data measured sex of perpetrators & victims...
                    
                                    
                    Over time & across cultures, sex has been a powerful predictor of crime & violence.
Decades of data measured sex of perpetrators & victims...
                        
                        
                        ...However, in recent release from  @StatCan_eng on   #GBV, focus is on violence committed against someone based on & #39;gender identity, gender expression or perceived gender& #39;.
See: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2020001/article/00008-eng.htm,
This">https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85... is key to capturing #transphobic violence & changes needed...
                    
                                    
                    See: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85-002-x/2020001/article/00008-eng.htm,
This">https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/85... is key to capturing #transphobic violence & changes needed...
                        
                        
                        ...But after a few decades conducting, teaching research, this seems step backward to me...
...we& #39;re collecting less data not more & putting lives of 2 groups at more risk because data will not accurately capture risk for either group.
Someone help me understand this decision?
                    
                
                ...we& #39;re collecting less data not more & putting lives of 2 groups at more risk because data will not accurately capture risk for either group.
Someone help me understand this decision?
 
                         Read on Twitter
Read on Twitter 
                             
                             
                             
                                     
                                    